首页> 外文OA文献 >The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score)
【2h】

The reliability of a new scoring system for knee osteoarthritis MRI and the validity of bone marrow lesion assessment: BLOKS (Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score)

机译:新的膝关节骨关节炎MRI评分系统的可靠性和骨髓病变评估的有效性:BLOKS(波士顿-利兹骨关节炎膝关节评分)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Aim: MRI provides unparalleled visualisation of all the anatomical structures involved in the osteoarthritis (OA) process. There is a need for reliable methods of quantifying abnormalities of these structures. The aim of\udthis work was to assess the reliability of a novel MRI scoring system for evaluating OA of the knee and explore the validity of the bone marrow lesion (BML) scoring component of this new tool.\udMethods: After review of the relevant literature, a collaborative group of rheumatologists and radiologists from centres in the UK and USA established preliminary anatomical divisions, items (necessarily broadly inclusive) and scaling for a novel semi-quantitative knee score. A\udseries of iterative reliability exercises were performed to reduce the initial items, and the reliability of the resultant Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) was examined. A further sample had both the BLOKS and WORMS (Whole Organ MRI Score) bone marrow lesion (BML) score performed to assess the construct validity (relation to knee pain) and longitudinal validity (prediction of cartilage loss) of each scoring method.\udResults: The BLOKS scoring method assesses nine intraarticular regions and contains eight items, including features of bone marrow lesions, cartilage, osteophytes,\udsynovitis, effusions and ligaments. The scaling for each feature ranges from 0–3. The inter-reader reliability for the\udfinal BLOKS items ranged from 0.51 for meniscal extrusion up to 0.79 for meniscal tear. The reliability for other key\udfeatures was 0.72 for BML grade, 0.72 for cartilage morphology, and 0.62 for synovitis. Maximal BML size on the BLOKS scale had a positive linear relation with visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, however the WORMS scale did not. Baseline BML was associated with cartilage loss on both BLOKS and WORMS scale. This association was\udstronger for BLOKS than WORMS.\udConclusion: We have designed a novel scoring system for MRI OA knee, BLOKS, that demonstrates good reliability. Preliminary inspection of the validity of one of the components of this new tool supports the validity of the BLOKS BML scoring method over an existing instrument. Further iterative development will include validation for use in both clinical trials and epidemiological studies.
机译:目的:MRI提供了无与伦比的可视化的骨关节炎(OA)过程中涉及的所有解剖结构。需要可靠的方法来量化这些结构的异常。这项工作的目的是评估一种新颖的MRI评分系统以评估膝关节骨关节炎的可靠性,并探索该新工具的骨髓病变(BML)评分组件的有效性。\ ud方法:在审查了相关内容之后文献中,来自英国和美国中心的风湿病学家和放射学家的协作小组建立了初步的解剖学部门,项目(必要时广泛地包括在内)和缩放,以得出新颖的半定量膝关节评分。进行了一系列反复的可靠性练习,以减少初始项目,并检查了所得的波士顿利兹骨关节炎膝关节评分(BLOKS)的可靠性。另一份样本同时进行了BLOKS和WORMS(全器官MRI评分)骨髓损伤(BML)评分,以评估每种评分方法的结构效度(与膝痛的关系)和纵向效度(软骨损失的预测)。\ udResults :BLOKS评分方法评估了9个关节内区域,包括8个项目,包括骨髓病变,软骨,骨赘,\ udsynov炎,积液和韧带的特征。每个功能的缩放范围为0–3。 \ udfinal BLOKS项目的阅读器间可靠性范围从半月板挤压的0.51到半月板撕裂的0.79。 BML级其他关键特征的可靠性为0.72,软骨形态为0.72,滑膜炎为0.62。 BLOKS量表上的最大BML大小与视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛呈正线性关系,但是WORMS量表没有。基线BML在BLOKS和WORMS量表上均与软骨损失有关。结论:我们为MRI OA膝关节BLOKS设计了一种新颖的评分系统,该系统显示出良好的可靠性。对该新工具组成部分之一的有效性进行的初步检查证实了BLOKS BML评分方法相对于现有仪器的有效性。进一步的迭代开发将包括用于临床试验和流行病学研究的验证。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hunter, David J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_AU
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号